Stoneleigh
and Auriol Residents' Association

Founded
in 1933
In our 77th
year and still looking
after the needs of all the residents in Stoneleigh
An introduction and welcome to
Stoneleigh and Auriol Residents’ Association (SARA)
from the Chairman, Bill Slaughter:
Dear
Visitor
I am delighted to welcome you to the website of Stoneleigh and Auriol Residents’
Association (SARA). The website is now updated every day,
to ensure that the latest SARA news is always available as soon as it happens.
On
Saturday 19th June, nearly 130 residents joined SARA's public protest against
the RA councillor's decision to order the permanent closure of the Council-operated toilets
in Stoneleigh Broadway from 24th June 2010. On
behalf of SARA's principal officers and the whole General Committee, I extend
our most sincere thanks to all who attended the public protest and signed SARA's
petition against the closure of the Stoneleigh toilets.
Photos from the public protest appear below - just scroll down to
SARA's STOP Campaign - Latest News.
The full story behind the RA Councillors secret decision to close the toilets
without any consultation with SARA can be viewed by clicking here >
Stoneleigh Toilets Closure.
Despite the strength of feeling clearly demonstrated at the public protest, the
order for closure of the toilets, which had been authorised by RA Councillor
Jean Smith (Chairman of Epsom and Ewell Borough Council's Environment
Committee), was put into effect on 24th June.
At
the public protest I renewed SARA's pledge, made unanimously by the General
Committee, that we will continue to fight on behalf of all Stoneleigh residents
until RA councillors have the
grace to accept that they made a wrong decision to close the Stoneleigh toilets and the courage to reverse the closure order.
The
public protest was organised by SARA
because, quite incredibly - and totally without foundation in fact - RA
councillors have actually been saying that there is, ''little or no local
support for keeping the toilets open". This just goes to show how out
of touch with public opinion these 'independent' RA councillors (who voted
unanimously to close all the council-operated toilets in the borough!) are. Worse
still, they continue to treat strong local opposition to the Stoneleigh toilet
closure with contempt.
We are still receiving many letters of support, for which
we thank all those who have written to us. Because we have received so many
letters and e-mails protesting against the toilets closure, we have had to
reproduce a selection of them in a separate link. To read some of the
letters and e-mails we have received, click here >
Stoneleigh Toilets Closure.
To view
all other SARA news, continue to scroll down to
Latest SARA News, where the most recent items
appear in blue type.
With more than 2,500 member households in Stoneleigh Ward and Auriol
Ward, SARA is the largest of all the RA's in Epsom and Ewell. It is also widely
regarded as being the most active. SARA (formerly Stoneleigh Residents'
Association) is one of the longest established residents' associations in the
borough and celebrated its 75th anniversary in 2008.
If you live in Stoneleigh, you can become a member of SARA for just
£2.00 per year per household. In addition to all the usual member benefits you
will also receive a copy of SARA’s quarterly magazine ‘The Resident’ – generally acknowledged as the best RA magazine in the whole
borough. To join, simply contact
the Joint Registrar for your ward click here >
How to join SARA. To read more about the
Association, click here > About SARA. To contact SARA by e-mail, please use this
e-mail address:
chairman@stoneleighandauriol.co.uk If
you would like to advertise in our magazine, please click here >
'The Resident' Magazine
for our Advertising Manager’s contact details.
Our website also includes all the latest local news from Surrey Police -
click here >
News from Surrey Police.
We
still currently have a small number of vacancies for Zone
Representatives (the current vacant zones are listed in 'The Resident'
magazine). Zone Representatives play a vital part in the smooth running of the
Association and we are always glad to welcome on board any of our residents who
feel able to contribute to it by taking up one of the vacant posts. If you are a
member of the Association and would like to discuss becoming a Zone Representative, please phone
Ken Shute on 020 8224 2796 if you live in Stoneleigh Ward or Natalie Rogers on 020
8393 6968 if you live in Auriol Ward.
You can read a brief history of Stoneleigh by
clicking here >
History of Stoneleigh.
SARA continues to go from strength to strength and we go forward in
the knowledge that the best interest of all our residents in Stoneleigh is at the heart of everything the Association does.
Yours sincerely
Bill Slaughter
Chairman, Stoneleigh and Auriol Residents’ Association (SARA).
SARA'S STOP Campaign - Latest News:
FROM
THE LETTERS PAGE, EPSOM GUARDIAN, 22nd JULY 2010:
STONELEIGH WARD SARA COUNCILLOR SANDY SANGER ABSTAINS
FROM 'BLUE BADGE' VOTE:
Councillor
Sandy Sanger, one of SARA's three Stoneleigh Ward RA councillors, was the ONLY
Residents' Association councillor present at last Tuesday's meeting of Epsom &
Ewell Borough Council who did not vote for the RA's proposal to
introduce the Traffic Order which would bring into effect the widely-condemned
charging of Blue Badge holders for using the Council's car parks. Cllr Sanger
abstained when the vote was taken at the Epsom & Ewell Borough Council
meeting on Tuesday 20th July.
All the other RA councillors present - except
Councillor Alan Winkworth (Stoneleigh Ward) and Councillor Clive Woodbridge
(Ewell Ward) - voted in favour of
confirming the Traffic Order to charge the disabled for parking and the RA
councillors narrowly won their motion by 16-14 votes. (Councillors Winkworth and
Woodbridge had left the council chamber prior to the Blue Badge debate and vote,
having each declared a personal interest due to family members holding Blue
Badges).
Cllr
Sanger (pictured left) also abstained in a second vote, along with Cllr
Pamela Bradley (Ewell Village RA), on an amendment motion calling on the Council
not to introduce charges to Blue Badge holders at the Council-run Ashley Centre
car park until planned improved access for disabled users is started and
completed. RA councillors just managed to defeat the amendment, this time by the
narrowest possible voting margin of 16-15.
In a strong message of support and
thanks to Cllr Sanger, SARA's Chairman, Bill Slaughter, wrote to Sandy, saying,
"I send you my sincere thanks for having had the courage to vote in
accordance with your conscience. I know that you are a strong supporter of those
less well off in body than we are. I think it was a vote, with the exception of
your honourable abstention, which cast a cloud of shame on all the RA
councillors who lacked the compassion to deal sympathetically with the less
fortunate in our society."
SARA'S STOP CAMPAIGN WINS SUPPORT FROM THE LEADER OF THE
CONSERVATIVE GROUP ON EPSOM & EWELL BOROUGH COUNCIL:
The
leader of the Conservative group of Epsom & Ewell Borough councillors, Councillor
Sean Sullivan (pictured left, at SARA's recent public protest against the
Stoneleigh toilets closure), has backed SARA's STOP Campaign to persuade RA
councillors to reverse their highly unpopular decision to close Stoneleigh's
only public convenience. Cllr Sullivan submitted a supportive motion for
discussion at the Council meeting on Tuesday 20th July but it was rejected by
the Mayor, RA Cllr Clive Smitheram, on the hotly-disputed grounds that it would
breach the six-month rule before an issue previously determined by Council can
be brought back for reconsideration.
The motion Cllr Sullivan attempted to get onto the order
paper was: "This council requires officers to
meet with representatives of Stoneleigh and Auriol Residents' Association and
present to this council any options that derive from that meeting that seek to
keep the Stoneleigh public toilets open to the public."
After "advice from officers" the Mayor made an extraordinary decision to rule the
motion out of order on the basis of no reconsideration of a decision within 6
months.
Cllr Sullivan, who intends to raise a point of order on the refusal to accept
his motion at Tuesday's Council meeting, wrote to SARA saying, "I have argued
with them that the decision recently made was to remove the council's funding
for public toilets, a consequence of which is that they will close. My motion
does not, on the face of it, ask them to reconsider committing that money and
therefore should have been allowed. They are still refusing to let it be
discussed."
SARA Chairman, Bill Slaughter, thanked Cllr Sullivan for
his support and said, "Cllr Sullivan's support is
most
welcome but it has to be said that it is in stark contrast to yet another
refusal by the RA group of councillors, at their meeting on Monday 12th July, to
reverse the unwelcome and unconsulted decision they took to close the Stoneleigh
toilets.
Their refusal, at the third time of our asking, was all
the more unfathomable after Stoneleigh Ward RA Councillor Sandy Sanger (pictured
left) again put forward a strong case - supported by fellow-Stoneleigh Ward
RA Councillor Ruby Smith - for the closure decision to be reversed."
EPSOM GUARDIAN'S FRONT PAGE LEAD PHOTO, 24TH JUNE 2010:

AND THE ARTICLE ON PAGE 4:

SOME OF THE PLACARDS:


PICTURES FROM SARA'S PUBLIC PROTEST ON SATURDAY 19TH OF JUNE
AGAINST THE RA COUNCILLOR'S DECISION TO CLOSE STONELEIGH'S ONLY PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE PERMANENTLY FROM 24TH JUNE:
|
 |
|
Residents
begin to gather at SARA's Public Protest |
|
|
 |
|
SARA's Chairman, Bill Slaughter, greets Norman
Bradbury
|
|
|
 |
|
Conservative
Councillor Sean Sullivan signs SARA's petition |
|
|
 |
|
And Town Ward
RA's Chairman, Michael Guest, adds his signature too |
|
|
 |
|
Lib-Dem
Councillor, Julie Morris, joins the "paparazzi"! |
|
|
 |
|
Protestors
assemble in front of the Stoneleigh toilets |
|
|
 |
|
Town Ward RA Chairman Michael Guest
shows his support for SARA's STOP Campaign |
|
|
 |
|
The protestors
line up for the press photos |
|
|
 |
|
SARA's Chairman,
Bill Slaughter, is called on to speak to the protestors |
|
|
 |
|
And the SARA
Chairman thanks everyone for coming |
|
|
 |
|
The men queue
up to "use" the Gents.... |
|
|
 |
|
And the ladies
form an orderly queue on the other side! |
|
|
 |
|
SARA Vice
Chairman, Mrs Barabara Shute, makes her point very well indeed! |
|
|
 |
|
Bill Slaughter
thanks Epsom Guardian's reporter, Thais Portilho-Shrimpton, for her
excellent coverage of the controversy |
|
FROM THE EPSOM GUARDIAN, 17-06-10:

IMPORTANT NOTE: Many of the letters and e-mails received
earlier can be viewed by clicking here >
Stoneleigh Toilets Closure
LETTER FROM SARA's SECRETARY, MIKE SAMPSON, IN THE
EPSOM GUARDIAN, 10th JUNE:

Latest SARA News:
GOVERNMENT LAUNCHES A REVIEW OF WASTE POLICY:
Reducing the amount of rubbish thrown away from homes needs to be made "as
easy as possible", Environment Secretary Caroline Spelman has said as she
launched a Government review of waste policy.
Among the areas the review will look at is ways to
cut the number of wheelie bins and containers people have to deal with to sort
their waste and recycling. In some areas, householders can be left struggling
with several wheelie bins or boxes for rubbish, recycling, food waste and
garden waste - which they may not have room for in their driveway or front
garden.
And in a move which could see a reversal in the trend towards fortnightly
bin rounds, brought in as part of efforts to boost recycling, the review will
also look at how Government can work with councils to increase the frequency
and quality of collections.
Mrs Spelman believes most people try to do the right thing when it comes to
recycling and disposing of their rubbish, and it is important to make it as
easy as possible for them to do so. As well as looking at how household and
business rubbish is collected, sorted and recycled, the examination of waste
policies will also consider ways to encourage businesses to reduce packaging
of products such as toys.
It will examine how best to encourage householders, companies and
communities to produce less waste and boost recycling - with a focus on
encouraging people with incentives rather than penalties and "coercion". The
review will also look at future infrastructure needs, including producing
energy from waste and from a biological process known as anaerobic digestion.
Mrs Spelman said the review was an opportunity to look at how to increase
recycling, reduce landfill - which costs councils in landfill tax - and unlock
the economic value of items which people no longer want. For example, throwing
aluminium cans away costs money in landfill tax and loses more money because
the used metal fetches hundreds of pounds a tonne, while manufacturing new
cans from raw materials takes 20 times more energy than using recycled
aluminium.
Courtesy of: Press Association
BOURNE HALL CELEBRATES 40TH BIRTHDAY:
Set in the heart of
historic Ewell Village, Bourne Hall is celebrating its 40th Birthday this year.
Since the modern building first opened its doors to the public in 1970, many
have enjoyed the diverse range of services available, from the library, museum
and exhibition space to its unique rooms and a vibrant café.
Built by Epsom & Ewell Borough Council in 1970 for £368,000, A G Sheppard Fidler
& Associates were the architects for Bourne Hall, with local firm W S Atkins
carrying out the construction. The man behind the design was Bob Loren. A
skeleton of concrete ribs support the copper dome, with a ring of windows
overlooking the park, while the dramatic outer lights were installed in 1999 by
the BBC children’s programme Blue Peter.
Over the years, Bourne Hall has been home to rising rock stars, artists, authors
and a resident cat. It has hosted conferences, festivals, parties and over 1,000
weddings. During July, Bourne Hall will host a number of events to celebrate its
special 40 year anniversary. For more information contact Bourne Hall on 020
8393 9571, email bournehall@epsom-ewell.gov.uk or visit wwww.epsom-ewell.gov.uk.
CONSUMER MAGAZINE NAMES EPSOM AND ST HELIER HOSPITAL TRUST
AS ONE OF THE FOUR WORST IN ENGLAND FOR HOSPITAL CAR PARKING:
Following
172 Freedom of Information Act requests, which brought 126 responses, ‘Which?’
magazine has named Epsom & St Helier Hospital Trust (Epsom Hospital, pictured
left) as having one of the four worst hospital car parks in England for
clamping, fining, charging and complaints.
The four worst car parks are:
• Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, which clamped 1,671 cars
in 2008-9 and made almost £1.9m profit from its car park operation;
• Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust's Leeds General Infirmary, whose 10,330
fines generated £142,000;
• Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust, which has the highest charge for
two hours' parking – £4;
• Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust's Royal Derby Hospital, which received
the most complaints – 82
When Which? surveyed 1,001 members of the public, they found that 70% of people
have experienced problems with an NHS hospital car park.
Which? also found that for 49% of NHS hospital visitors the hospital car park
had made their visit more stressful.
Ms Samantha Jones, the Trust’s Chief Executive, issued a statement on 9th June
saying, “I have launched a review of our car parking today to ensure we are
doing all we can to strike the balance between having well run car parks, whilst
making sure we do not make it difficult for our staff to do their jobs, damage
patients' access to services or stop friends and relatives visiting.”
THE FULL TEXT OF RA COUNTY COUNCILLOR EBER KINGTON'S
LETTER TO EPSOM GUARDIAN:
In
the week we learned that Surrey is the worst place in the country for potholes
it was revealed that the Conservative Leader of the County Council has increased
his own personal budget for “policy initiatives” by £1 million. I am not sure
whether this huge increase of 200% (from £½ million) was achieved from cuts to
the highways, adult social care or the education budget, but to take £1½ million
out of the County Council’s annual budget just so that the Leader can be seen to
be making grand gestures throughout the year is a disgrace.
Ordinary County Councillors like me have no power
to scrutinise the spending of this money before it is allocated.
No doubt we will learn how it is to be distributed through
one of the many press releases that spin out of County Hall on a regular basis.
However, we will also be reminded on a daily basis, as we bump over the latest
pothole, just what the Leader’s £1½ million might do if it were spent on
improving the dreadful state of our roads.
County Councillor Eber A Kington
RA, Epsom and Ewell North
Note: This is the FULL text of the letter from Eber
Kington (pictured above) published in the Epsom Guardian on 18th March
2010, showing in brown type
the text edited out by the newspaper.
CONCERN OVER ADULT SOCIAL SERVICES IN SURREY:
A Care Quality Commission report has named and shamed
eight local councils over their care of vulnerable and elderly people. As many as
80,000 people are living in care homes or receiving services rated as only
"poor" or "adequate", according to a government inspectorate.
The names of the local councils have been
revealed by the Care Quality Commission (CQC). In its first detailed survey of the quality of adult social care in
England, the commission told the eight councils – Bromley, Cornwall, Peterborough,
Poole, Solihull, South Tyneside, Southwark and Conservative-controlled Surrey
County Council – that they must make improvements as a priority.
Stephen Burke, of the charity Counsel and Care, said: "The report shows that
despite some improvement overall, the standard of care experienced by many
vulnerable older people living in care homes in England still remains completely
inadequate. More work needs to be done by local councils and care providers to ensure that
personalised services become a reality for all older people and carers
regardless of whether they live at home or in a care home, including access to
good information and advice."
SPEEDING AND RED LIGHT CAMERAS IN STONELEIGH:
More than 1,000 traffic-cameras used to catch drivers jumping red lights are to
be converted so they can also trap speeders. In January the traffic light cameras
at Stoneleigh Park Road, at its junction with the A240 Kingston Road
(southbound) and the A240 Kingston Road, at its junction with Bradford Drive
(northbound), were upgraded and will now be able to record both red light
violations AND speeding motorists. They will become fully operational as soon as the
necessary signage is in place.
The traffic light camera was originally used to measure red light offences.
Nowadays the camera can also be used in combination with speed measurement,
similar to that of a Gatso speed camera. So you could end up with a speeding
offence as well as a traffic light offence, if you go through a red light
camera.
Points and Penalties: Being prosecuted in the UK by a traffic light camera can
result in a minimum of 3 penalty points and a fine. The fine amount is currently
under review by the government and may increase in the near future.
COUNCIL VOTES UNANIMOUSLY TO AWARD THE FREEDOM OF THE
BOROUGH OF EPSOM & EWELL TO THE PRINCESS OF WALES'S ROYAL REGIMENT:

At a Special Meeting of Epsom & Ewell Borough Council
held on Tuesday 5th January
2010, borough councillors voted unanimously to approve an amended resolution put forward
by the Chairman of the Council's Strategy & Resources Committee, Cuddington Ward Residents' Association Councillor Keith Mann (pictured
left), to award the
Freedom of the Borough to the Princess of Wales's Royal Regiment.
Councillor Mann's
amended resolution read:
"In recognition of
their service over the years and in the current conflict, the Borough Council of
Epsom and Ewell confer the Freedom of the Borough on the Princess of Wales’s
Royal Regiment and that The Chief Executive and Chairman of Strategy and
Resources Committee, be delegated to prepare an address or casket containing an
address at a cost not to exceed £2,000 for presentation to the Regiment by The
Mayor on a date to be determined."
Commenting on the unanimous vote in favour of the amended resolution he had
proposed, Councillor Mann said, "I am pleased to support this decision in
recognition of this regiment and its established history. The Council honours
all members of the armed forces and we will be making a presentation to the
Princess of Wales’s Royal Regiment in due course."
A CLEAR MESSAGE FROM THE EPSOM GUARDIAN (12.11.09) TO SURREY COUNTY
COUNCIL:

BBC SURREY HEADLINES RA CHAIRMEN'S COMPLAINT
ON COMMUNITY GANGS RE-SCHEDULING:

The
chairmen of all three residents’ associations in Surrey County Council’s Epsom &
Ewell North Division have angrily condemned the County Council’s “appalling and
disgraceful” re-scheduling of the Community Gangs - the County Council’s
contracted workforce provided by Carrillion and Ringway which carries out a
range of general highways repairs.
Neil Bevan (Cuddington
RA), Bill Slaughter, Stoneleigh and Auriol RA (SARA) and Les Duplock (Ewell
Court RA) pictured left to right, are furious that it has been more than
three and a half months since the Community Gang last carried out any highway
maintenance in their Division, which covers parts of Ewell, Stoneleigh and
Worcester Park. The chairmen’s anger was increased when their Epsom & Ewell
North Division Residents’ Association County Councillor, Eber Kington, informed
them that he has now been advised that the Community Gang will not be in the
area again until week commencing Monday 2nd November - some four months since
the last visit.
Speaking on behalf of
all three RA chairmen, SARA Chairman Bill Slaughter, said, “It is an
appalling and disgraceful fact that the last time the Community Gang was in
Epsom and Ewell North carrying out general highways repairs was in week
beginning 13th July. They were due to be in the Division again in the week
beginning Monday 31st August. That was postponed. Their next visit was scheduled
for Monday 7th September, then re-scheduled for Monday 14th September, then
re-scheduled again for Monday 21st September – at which point they were whisked
off elsewhere to wash road signs!”
The RA chairmen’s fury
at the lack of attention to highway maintenance in the Epsom and Ewell North
Division came in response to a self-congratulatory press release issued on 16th
October by the beleaguered Conservative-controlled County Council – the only
Conservative-controlled council in England and Wales to be given the lowest
possible 1-star rating by the Audit Commission earlier this year – in which it
was claimed that, ‘‘Street signs around the county have had a wash and brush-up
as Surrey County Council’s community gangs devoted a week to cleaning them.’’
Defending removing the
Community Gangs from their usual tasks, Tory County Councillor Ian Lake (the
same councillor who tried unsuccessfully to arrange the secret sell-off of
Nonsuch Mansion House!), the County Council’s Cabinet Member for Transport,
was quoted in the press release as saying, “When road signs get dirty they
are hard to read … cleaning up the signs improves the look of the neighbourhood,
making it a place that residents can feel proud of.”
Bill Slaughter denounced Councillor Lake’s remarks saying, “The poor standard
of repair work to our potholes and kerbstones might suggest that the average
Ringway and Carillion worker probably does operate at the skill level of a
road-sign washer. However, I think that it should have been possible to employ
some temporary unskilled labour to wash road-signs whilst the Community Gangs
got on with the jobs that our residents really want done – road repairs.”
On Wednesday 4th November, BBC
Surrey's Breakfast Show presenter Nick Wallace headlined the issue and featured
an interview with SARA Chairman Bill Slaughter, which followed earlier comments
on the show by Cllr Lake.
To listen to Nick Wallace's live interview with
Bill Slaughter, click here >
BBC Surrey, 4th November 2009.
SURREY COUNTY COUNCIL LOSES DATA ON “THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES”:
Local councils have an
unfortunate knack of ending up in the headlines after suffering data loss
incidents. Either because of their obligation to report such events or because
some aspect of their operations results in an inordinate amount of risk,
councils dominate the Information Commissioner’s Office’s guilty list. In the
past year, Conservative-controlled Surrey County Council reported the loss of
thousands of details of children and families on lost county council-owned laptops and BlackBerrys.
From:
Information Age, 21st October 2009, by JJ Robinson.
DAVID SMITH MADE AN HONORARY FREEMAN OF EPSOM & EWELL:

At a special meeting of
Epsom & Ewell Borough Council on Wednesday 4th November 2009, Mr David Smith (pictured
left), the Council’s long-serving former Chief Executive was made an
Honorary Freeman of the Borough. David
Smith, Chief Executive of Epsom & Ewell Borough Council, retired on 31st July
2009 after 23 years of service.
The decision to leave followed David’s
continuing recovery from a stroke in October 2008. A solicitor with a career in
local government, David Smith joined Epsom & Ewell Borough Council as Chief
Executive in 1986.
In
moving the motion to confer the title of Honorary Freeman on David Smith, RA
Councillor Eber Kington (Ewell Court Ward) paid a glowing tribute to Mr Smith,
saying that, "As
the youngest Town Clerk and Chief Executive in Surrey, David had set about
introducing more corporate ways of working, involving more junior officers in
decision making and building a team that pulled together rather than spending
time fighting the Chief Executive. However, that engagement with people
was never about you personally. For you it was about ensuring the reputation of
this Council as a listening organisation, caring about the needs and aspirations
of residents, partners and indeed members of staff within the organisation
itself. And it was also about getting the job done. For you understood that
engaging directly with individuals and organisations was crucial to ensuring
that you carried people with you and that the change you felt was so necessary
came about."
Councillor Kington
recalled David Smith's "phenomenal memory" and called it "a quality
upon which councillors in particular came to rely", adding that, "We
never ceased to be amazed by your ability to remember notes, memos and letters
filed away several years previously; your ability to instantly recall Council
and Committee decisions taken long ago, and crucially your ability to pronounce
on the Council’s constitution – even while the next point of order was being
shouted (politely) from the ranks of over-excited councillors in the chamber.
To be able to recall information, explain it clearly, and at a moments
notice, is a rare skill and one that we came to appreciate and rely upon over
the years."
Listing many of David Smith's outstanding achievements, Councillor Eber Kington
singled out the massive part David Smith played in preventing
Conservative-controlled Surrey County Council's secret planned sell-off of the
Grade 2*-listed Nonsuch Mansion House in Nonsuch Park - a plot discovered and
foiled at the time by SARA. Praising Mr Smith's long and arduous battle with the
Tory-led County Council, Councillor Kington addressed David and said, "It
was you and absolutely no one else who negotiated Surrey County Council into
conceding that its plans for the commercial sale of the House were flawed and
that the Nonsuch Park Joint Management Committee was the natural guardian of this
local heritage site."
David Smith joins a distinguished list of Honorary Freemen of the Borough. The
title has only been conferred 15 times in the 75-year history of the Borough
Council.
CRONYISM CLAIMS “DIFFICULT TO REFUTE” SAY SCC’S AUDITORS:
Surrey County Council
waived normal procurement procedures for Common Purpose contract. Surrey County
Council's waiving of normal procurement procedures for a £41,000 contract with
leadership training charity Common Purpose made it difficult to refute
allegations of cronyism, the authority's auditors have found.
The internal review,
seen by Third Sector, says officials failed to set out the need to send four
employees on a leadership course in 2008 or to assess alternative providers. The
review says this made it hard for the authority to demonstrate that the courses,
for which the council paid Common Purpose £41,000, were value for money.
It also says that a
number of senior council officers had previous dealings with Common Purpose,
although there was no evidence that any had benefited personally from the Surrey
contract. But it says their successful application to waive normal procedures
had led to allegations of cronyism that "though false, are difficult to refute".
From: Third Sector, 27 October 2009, by Paul Jump.
SURREY COUNTY COUNCIL: HOW THEY SPEND YOUR COUNCIL TAX -
ON THEMSELVES:
In the year 2007-8, the number of senior Surrey
County Council officers
paid in excess of £50k per annum leapt by the staggering figure of 250 - an
increase of almost 60% from
the previous year.
Remuneration paid to 674 senior officers of
Conservative-controlled Surrey County Council during 2007-08 fell within the
following bands:
Remuneration Band*: Number of
Cost to Council
senior officers*:
Tax-payers in 2007-8:
2007-08: (2006-7):
£50,000-59,999
397
(253)
£19.85million - £23.81million
£60,000-69,999
154
(87)
£9.24million - £10.77million
£70,000-79,999
60
(41)
£4.2million - £4.79million
£80,000-89,999
33
(22)
£2.64million - £2.9million
£90,000-99,999
14
(10)
£1.26million - £1.39million
£100,000-109,999
7 (4)
£700,000 - £769,993
£110,000-119,999
2 (2)
£220,000 - £239,998
£130,000-139,999
2 (0)
£260,000 - £279,998
£150,000-159,999
1 (3)
£150,000 - £159,999
£160,000-169,999
3 (2)
£480,000 - £509,997
£200,000-209,999
1 (0)
£200,000 - £209,999
TOTAL: 674
(424) £39.2million - £45.8million
674 senior officers were paid in excess of
£50,000pa
- a 58.96% increase from the
previous year. (Amounts exclude pension costs, but include all payments, taxable allowances, the monetary value
of other employee benefits, lump sum redundancy and pay in lieu of notice
payments).
What did you get in return? The County Council with the lowest possible Audit
Commission rating. The County Council given a 1-star rating (again, the lowest
possible) by Ofsted. The County Council with arguably the worst record in
England and Wales for repairing potholes. A County Council that is still
refusing to implement the Children Act in full, despite damning reports by the
Audit Commission, Ofsted and its own outgoing Interim Chief Executive.
* Source: Surrey County Council
Statement of Accounts 2007-08
BECOMING A BLOOD DONOR NOW COULD SAVE SOMEBODY’S LIFE!
The
National Blood
Service is an integral part of the National Health Service, and guarantees to deliver blood, blood components, blood
products and tissues from 15 blood centres to anywhere in England and North Wales.
National Blood Service ensures that the blood is properly screened and is safe for patients. Every
year the National Blood Service collects, tests, processes, stores and issues 2.1 million blood
donations. It depends entirely on voluntary donations from the general public,
and tries to encourage existing donors to give three times a year (it's amazing
what the promise of a free cup of tea and some biscuits will do!).
Please assist National Blood Service to maintain a healthy level of blood
stocks. Blood stocks are under constant pressure and it is experiencing
difficulties in encouraging new people to become blood donors (currently only 4%
of the eligible population chooses to donate blood).
To donate blood at Bourne Hall, please check the dates and times of Blood Donor
Sessions by looking under ‘Useful Local Information’ - click on the ‘Useful
Local Information’ link in the left-hand column.
SCC INTERIM CHIEF
EXECUTIVE'S "DAMNING" REPORT ON TORY-CONTROLLED COUNTY COUNCIL:
In what has been described by an
Epsom & Ewell Residents' Association county councillor as "one
of the most damning reports ever written about a county council by its own Chief
Executive", Mr Michael Frater CBE (pictured left), the outgoing Interim
Chief Executive of Conservative-controlled Surrey County Council delivered a
'Diagnostic and Stocktake' Handover Report to the County Council's Cabinet
on the 14th July 2009. It is a shocking indictment of more than 20 years of misrule by
Conservative councillors - and the senior officers employed by the
Tory-controlled county council.
Mr Frater has 15 years of experience as a
chief executive at four urban local authorities and has a strong track record of
success in local government.
Mr Frater's key comments were:
"In January 2009 when I took up post of interim Chief
Executive there was a significant degree of denial amongst key members and
managers about the wider problems in the County Council..."
"The difficult position in which the County Council finds itself is
fundamentally a failure of leadership, culture and governance in its widest
sense."
"... the County Council is also seen as remote by a number of partners and
District and Borough Councils... this has contributed to, or been fed by a
stance or style that is viewed as superior and arrogant. This is not a sound
base on which to build a healthy culture, effective partnerships, or a customer
focussed organisation."
"The organisation is widely viewed as lacking vision, direction and strategy and
instead operates by a series of often disconnected short-term tactics."
"The most striking aspect of the management style in Surrey is how bureaucratic
it has become as a result of an obsession with the control of inputs and
resources since BDR [Business Development Review] which is then mistaken for a
focus on efficiency."
One consequence of the breakdown in trust (for which officers must take a
significant share of responsibility) is that some senior members [Conservative councillors] have increasingly seen their role as micromanaging
services on a day to day operational basis."
"A particularly worrying feature of the management style frequently referred to
by both backbench Members and managers is a ‘macho’ style, a blame culture and
bullying which is carried out and experienced by both Members and officers. This
must be challenged and action taken. It is wholly unacceptable."
"A further feature of the organisation’s management style which arises from
arrogance and remoteness is a “not invented here” attitude. In other words there
is a belief that a response to an issue developed in another local authority
must be inferior because it was not developed in Surrey."
"... there is a belief by many that because a number of private sector
approaches have been adopted that Surrey is automatically very efficient. It is
not. There is considerable scope for much greater efficiency across much of the
County Council. Even when adjusted for the ‘Surrey cost factor’ many unit costs
are higher than in comparable County Councils."
"There are two absolutely critical, and related areas of low level functionality
or lack of fitness for purpose. The first is medium term planning and budgeting.
This is ill developed, and unsustainable. It is not based on a strategy, on
priorities or on need. It is not corporate nor is it sustainable. "
"I have not seen an approach as unsophisticated as this in my entire career.
Given the financial and economic challenges facing Surrey County Council over
the next ten years this cannot be allowed to continue. This serious shortcoming
almost certainly accounts for much of the inefficiency already referred to and
is undoubtedly a contributory factor to the poor inspection results during
2008."
"The culture of the organisation is not healthy. There is a strong focus on
processes, control and inputs which is not matched by that on delivery, outcomes
and achievement. In other words much of the activity of the organisation is
self-serving, difficult issues tend to be swept under the carpet and with the
weaknesses in planning, budgeting and performance management this obsession with
bureaucracy is rarely challenged."
"To illustrate this I have heard on a number of occasions that the term
“Organisational Culture” had been banned because ‘there is no such thing, people
will do as they are told’. If this is true the poor state of the organisation
should not be a surprise. This approach shows a striking lack of sophistication
to the management of a large and complex organisation and it is an approach that
sustains a culture of blame and bullying. It would also explain the eventual
fall from grace in terms of Ofsted, CSCI (CQC) and Audit
Commission assessments."
"The organisation is controlling not empowering which when allied to blaming and
bullying leads to risk-averse behaviour."
"The County Council does not really provide very much community leadership at a
strategic level."
"If the County Council is to improve its relationships with the various
communities of Surrey it needs to do much more to recognise value and work with
the Districts and Boroughs."
"There is a strong and widely held view amongst backbench members that both
Local Committees and Select Committees need to be fundamentally reviewed."
"The blaming and bullying, the arrogance and remoteness, the ‘not invented here’
approach, the associated inability for the organisation to learn have in
combination created a situation where it seems that almost everyone in the
organisation could see what was wrong, but no one felt able, empowered or safe
enough to articulate it."
"... what has become clear is that the culture of the organisation does not
encourage difficult issues to be confronted and addressed, quite the opposite in
fact. This results in fundamental problems being known by everyone but ignored
by all. They are either swept under the carpet or remain as ‘the elephant in the
room’."
Mr Frater's full report can be viewed by clicking here >
Michael Frater's SCC
Report.
FROM THE EPSOM GUARDIAN 27th AUGUST 2009:

A NEW SCC CHIEF EXECUTIVE - BUT THE MADNESS CONTINUES:
In a highly undistinguished start to his new career
as the £200,000+ per year Chief Executive of Surrey County Council, Mr David McNulty
(pictured left), has
failed spectacularly to halt the out-of-control spending of council tax-payers' money on
absurd job appointments. Following the recent advertisement for an 'Estates Manager'
(a relatively junior role in an already top-heavy department) at a salary of
almost £80,000p.a., the Conservative-controlled County Council is now recruiting
a £46,000 pounds per year "Olympics co-ordinator" - even though it is not
hosting ANY of the events at the 2012 games!
The Tory-run county council is looking to appoint the "Olympics Co-ordinator" on a three-year contract with the
task of ensuring "the Surrey 2012 programme has maximum impact."
A job advert says the council wants someone who will create an Olympic legacy
for the county. The advert states, "We are looking for a skilled networker and influencer, who can inspire
innovation and creativity in our partners."
Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said existing
council officers can do the job.
"Given that Surrey aren't even hosting any Olympic events in 2012, this job is
unnecessary," he said. "If there are implications for transport, leisure or
other services, then that falls well within the jobs of existing council
officers who are already quite well paid enough to do the job. This smacks of
gimmickry by the council, who seem more keen to demonstrate that they are in
touch with current events than to deliver good value for money."
SARA's Chairman, Bill Slaughter, said, "Despite being
criticised strongly in a 2008 Comprehensive Performance Assessment by OFSTED for
failing to fully implement the Children Act 2004 and being given the
lowest-possible 1-star rating for its Children's Services, the Council is still
hell-bent on squandering taxpayer's money on useless appointments, rather than
spending money on implementing the Act in full."
The Audit Commission’s summary
concluded that, “Surrey County Council is not improving adequately. Overall levels of
improvement and service provision are variable. Services for vulnerable children
and young people do not meet minimum requirements and safeguarding is inadequate.”
Speaking
to the Epsom Guardian, Residents' Association County Councillor Eber Kington
(Epsom and Ewell North Division) - one of SARA's two RA county councillors -
said the recruitment was “extraordinary” given the financial situation.
County Councillor Kington (pictured left) said: “The (county) council has
already lost money in Icelandic banks and cut back £1million in road repairs. I
think at a time when everything is being cut back it could use the money better."
"Do the residents feel that an Olympic legacy is their first priority right
now? Surely street lighting, roads and crime prevention are more important. At
the moment the message, after the interim report, is that the county council is
inefficient. Local people are getting pretty fed up with their local authority.”
The Tory-controlled county council was recently described by the outgoing chief
executive Michael Frater as “arrogant” and “bullying."
STONELEIGH RAILWAY STATION - BOOKING OFFICE REVISED
OPENING TIMES:
Please note the revised opening
hours as follows:
MON-FRI: 06.10h to 13.00h (instead of 06.30h to 13.30h)
SAT-SUN: 08.00h to 14.00h.
SURREY
COUNTY COUNCIL
ELECTION - ALL FOUR SEATS IN EPSOM & EWELL HELD BY RESIDENTS' ASSOCIATION
COUNCILLORS RETAINED IN SUPERB ELECTION VICTORY:
In
Epsom & Ewell North East Division, David Wood chalked
up the biggest success of the day by defeating the Conservative candidate,
Councillor Nigel
Petrie (pictured right), who had defected to the Conservatives after failing to gain reselection
as the Residents' Associations of Epsom and Ewell candidate. Electors in the
division signalled their anger at Mr Petrie's defection to the Tories by voting
David Wood in by almost two and a half times as many votes as former Councillor Petrie,
giving David Wood the largest number of votes for any candidate in the whole
borough and more votes in the Division than all the national political parties combined.
David Wood not only received the highest number of votes for any candidate in
Epsom & Ewell but he also increased the RA share of the vote in his Division, from the 42%
gained in 2005 by former RA county councillor Petrie in 2005, to almost 59% -
the highest percentage vote of any Division in the borough. Voters
clearly dismissed a personal plea from the local Tory MP Chris Grayling -
currently embroiled in the House of Commons expenses scandal - who urged
electors to "vote for Nigel."
In Epsom & Ewell North Division, Eber Kington secured
more than 57% of
the total votes cast, gaining more votes than all the national political party
candidates in the Division put together. Eber Kington received almost three
times the number of votes cast for the Tory candidate, David Collins.
 |
 |
| Stoneleigh and
Auriol Residents' Association's Chairman,
Bill Slaughter (centre), pictured with SARA's victorious Residents
Association of Epsom and Ewell candidates, Eber Kington (pictured left) and David Wood (pictured right). |
The four
successful Residents' Associations candidates - from left to right; David
Wood (Epsom & Ewell North East), Eber Kington (Epsom & Ewell North), Chris
Frost (Epsom & Ewell South East) and Jan Mason (Epsom & Ewell West)
|
Surrey County Council
Election held on 4th June 2009:
Epsom & Ewell North East Division (which
includes Stoneleigh Ward):
DAVID WOOD - Residents Associations of Epsom
and Ewell: 2,678 votes - ELECTED
PETRIE - Con: 1164
DAPRE - Lib Dem: 330
O'BRIEN - Green: 221
LENNON-NITSCHE - Lab: 174
Turnout: 40.49%
RA Majority:1514 votes RA Share of Poll: 58.64%
Epsom & Ewell North Division
(which includes Auriol Ward):
EBER KINGTON - Residents
Associations of Epsom and Ewell: 2,572 votes - ELECTED
COLLINS - Con: 870
KEFFORD - UKIP: 397
DIXON - Lib Dem: 286
GELEIT - Lab: 203
FEWSTER - Green: 158
Turnout: 38.71%
RA Majority: 1702 votes RA Share of Poll: 57.33%
Other Epsom & Ewell results:
Epsom & Ewell South East Division:
CHRIS FROST - Residents Associations of Epsom
and Ewell 1,582 votes - ELECTED
MOUNTAIN - Con:
1416
COMAN - Lib Dem: 905
TAYLOR - UKIP: 279
GRINYER - Lab: 152
Turnout: 46.86%
Epsom & Ewell West Division:
JAN MASON - West Ewell and Ruxley Residents
Association: 1,436 votes - ELECTED
PONTIN - Con: 1014
SMITH - UKIP: 421
CARLSON (S) - Lab: 346
DERRETT - Lib Dem: 300
PAYNE - Green: 150
Turnout: 34.11%
Epsom & Ewell South West Division:
Colin TAYLOR - Lib Dem: 1,671
votes -
ELECTED
PETIT - Con: 1005
CHRISTINE LONG - Residents Associations of
Epsom and Ewell: 828 votes
CANE - UKIP: 387
CARLSON (A) - Lab: 295
Turnout: 35.37%
SURREY COUNTY COUNCIL
"STILL REFUSING" TO DISCLOSE FULL COSTS OF FAILED HIGH COURT APPLICATION FOR
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF OFSTED RATING:
A disclosure obtained under the Freedom of Information Act has failed to force
Surrey County Council to reveal the actual amount of money it spent in an abortive
attempt to overturn Ofsted's 1-star rating of its Children's Services - which led
to the Audit Commission rating the Conservative-controlled County Council as one of
the four worst councils in the country.
The Tory-led Council will only admit
to having spent:
Counsel advice on the judicial review: £11,477 (inc VAT).
Costs awarded against the Council: £4,730.
Court application fee: £50.
Surrey County Council is claiming that it cannot provide the
cost of officers' time preparing the case (which runs into tens of thousands of
pounds), saying, "If
required, we can provide information from our time recording system as to the
time spent by certain lawyers on this matter but this will not include the time
spent by the Head of Legal Services or any other council officers as this is not
recorded in this way."
A highly-placed source inside County Hall has told SARA that
the total amount of tax-payer's money spent on the failed High Court application
- with the cost of officer time included - is a figure, "well in
excess of £50,000."
FAIRVIEW NEW HOMES' REVISED PLANNING
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT OF FORMER SCHOOL LAND IN CUDDINGTON AVENUE APPROVED
BY COUNCIL'S PLANNING COMMITTEE:
On Thursday 16th
April 2009, Epsom & Ewell Borough Council's Planning Committee unanimously
approved the much-revised new planning application for development of the former
school land in Cuddington Avenue.
The outcome heralds a successful
conclusion to the nine month-long campaign on behalf of residents by the
Cuddington Avenue Joint Advisory Group, set up jointly by Stoneleigh and Auriol
Residents' Association (SARA) with Cuddington Residents' Association.
Having successfully defeated the original
widely-detested application last October, the Group worked closely over many
months with the developer Fairview New Homes Ltd to produce a family-led housing
scheme of considerably reduced density and far more in keeping with the visual
characteristics of existing homes in the area.
More than one hundred residents from Cuddington and
Auriol Wards had previously attended a meeting hosted by the Joint Advisory Group
at Bourne Hall on Monday 12th January 2009, at which senior
directors of Fairview New Homes Ltd presented the new scheme.
On a show of hands before the end of the
Bourne Hall meeting
(pictured below), considerably more than 90% of the residents present
signalled their support for the newly-proposed scheme, which carries the
endorsement of the Joint Advisory Group.

SURREY COUNTY COUNCIL
FAILS IN OFSTED LEGAL CHALLENGE:

Conservative-controlled
Surrey County Council has lost its bid for a judicial review of Ofsted's
"inadequate" rating for its children's services department. The council launched
the legal move in February, claiming that the inspectorate's Annual Performance
Assessment in December failed to take into account improvements the department
had made since a damning Joint Area Review earlier in the year.
The judicial
review was also seen as a bid to rescue the one-star Comprehensive Performance
Assessment the authority received from the Audit Commission this year – which
was directly related to its children's services rating. However Mr Justice Sales
refused the council's application on the grounds that Ofsted had acted "well
within the bounds of rationality" in considering Surrey's capacity to improve
its children's services.
Mr Justice
Sales concluded, "Ofsted properly considered that there were some indications of
improvement, but considered that these were not sufficiently widespread or
relevant to bring the claimant into the "adequate" category." He said,
"The
assessment of placement in the "adequate" as opposed to "inadequate"
category does not turn upon whether there has been an absence of any track
record of improvement whatsoever, in any area." He also awarded the inspectorate
£4,730 in costs.
An Ofsted
spokeswoman said the organisation had believed all along that the review bid
was "without merit". "We conduct all of our work with the utmost rigour and we
are pleased at this outcome", she said.
(Source: Local Government Chronicle).
SARA’s Chairman Bill
Slaughter, issued the following statement after the High Court verdict was
announced: “County council tax-payers in Surrey will be delighted that the
High Court has refused Conservative-controlled Surrey County Council’s
application for Judicial Review of Ofsted’s 1-star rating of its children’s
services.
The county council
has said that it will not seek leave to appeal against the ruling and I have no
doubt whatsoever that the decision not to appeal was taken in the light of
pressure brought to bear on the county council by Stoneleigh and Auriol
Residents’ Association (SARA).
SARA's
widespread publicity of the cynical and politically-motivated legal action taken
by the Tory-led county council in the run-up to the county elections in June has
forced the county council to abandon any further pointless legal challenges to
Ofsted’s rating.”
The Audit
Commission’s Corporate Performance Assessment 1-star rating now stands and
Surrey County Council remains one of the four worst-performing councils in
England and Wales – and the only one which is Conservative-controlled.
EPSOM & EWELL BOROUGH COUNCIL - GOOD NEWS!
Epsom & Ewell’s Residents’ Association-led borough council has scored massively
well in the Audit Commission’s latest District Council Use of Resources ratings.
This shows Epsom and Ewell Borough Council graded at level 3, “constantly
above minimum requirements and performing well.” Only 13 out of 238 District
Councils scored higher than E&EBC.
BLOOD
DONOR SESSIONS AND NEIGHBOURHOOD POLICE PANEL MEETINGS:
Details
of future dates for Blood Donor Sessions at Bourne Hall and Neighbourhood Police
Panel meetings at The Baptist Church in Stoneleigh can be viewed by clicking
here > Useful
Local Information.
SARA's 75th ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION DINNER - SATURDAY 25TH OCTOBER 2008:
|

|
|
On Saturday 25th
October, SARA marked its 75th Anniversary with a Celebration Dinner in the Banqueting Suite at Bourne Hall. The Dinner was preceded by a Sherry Reception. The Guests of Honour were the Mayor and Mayoress of Epsom & Ewell,
Cllr Alan and Mrs Vanessa Winkworth. |
|
|

|
|
One of the many highlights of the evening was the cutting of the 75th Anniversary Celebration Cake by The Mayor, Councillor Alan Winkworth. The hand-made
cake featuring the SARA logo was designed and created by Corteil and
Barratt. |
|
|

|
|
|
SARA President and Chairman, Mr Bill Slaughter, invites The Mayor to cut the Celebration Cake.
|
|
FOR ALL THE
PICTURES FROM THE ANNIVERSARY DINNER, CLICK HERE > SARA's
75th Anniversary Dinner photos.
YOUR
SARA COUNCILLORS:
All your
elected Stoneleigh and Auriol Residents' Association borough and county
councillors serve on a wide-ranging variety of council committees, panels and
outside bodies. To view the complete list click here > Councillors.
NEIGHBOURHOOD
POLICE PANEL:
Neighbourhood Police Panel
meetings are held on a quarterly basis and a new weekly
police surgery is now being held at Stoneleigh Library. The surgery is designed
to provide a weekly point of contact for the community and police. Victim
Support Surrey is now offering a drop-in service at their Epsom office, every
Monday, Wednesday and Friday morning, for people who have been the victim of a
crime. For full details of all these services click here > Useful
Local Information.